We bring market insights, news and lifestyle updates direct to your inbox.

Sign up to our newsletters >

See the properties 
defining luxury in the 
Luxury Homes magazine

Price-to-income ratios are the most commonly used metric to explain housing affordability. Across much of the developed world, these ratios sit well above their long-run averages. In Australia, they are at record or near-record highs. The latest Cotality Housing Affordability Report shows the national dwelling value to income ratio reached 8.2 in September 2025, compared with a 20-year average of 6.8. It now takes 11 years to save a 20 per cent deposit, and 45 per cent of gross household income is required to service a new mortgage. Three of the four key affordability measures tracked in the report are at their weakest levels on record.

The drivers of high housing prices are well understood. Supply constraints, planning systems, population growth, construction costs and tax settings have all been extensively analysed. The more relevant question is not why housing is expensive, but how buyers are still able to transact at these levels.

Home ownership rates are declining, particularly among younger Australians, and affordability pressures are a clear driver of that trend. Elevated price-to-income ratios point to increasing structural barriers to entry. Yet the market continues to transact. Prices remain resilient and first home buyers are still active. The issue is not that affordability has improved, but that access has become more conditional. Price-to-income ratios highlight the pressure, but they do not explain how participation is being sustained.

One limitation of the price-to-income ratio is that it compares the median dwelling value to the median household income, implicitly suggesting the median-income household is attempting to purchase the median home. But half of all homes sell below the median price. The median is not the entry-level benchmark; it is simply the midpoint of the market.

First home buyers are not typically purchasing the median dwelling. They are buying in the lower half of the price distribution. As affordability pressures increase, they shift further down that spectrum. This is visible in the sales data. Over the past decade, the number of houses sold nationally under $750,000 has fallen sharply, declining from around 248,000 in 2015 to roughly 153,000 in 2025. Entry-level detached housing has contracted significantly. In contrast, unit sales under $750,000 have held up more strongly, rising from approximately 77,000 in 2015 to close to 96,000 in 2025.


This divergence suggests affordability pressures are reshaping demand rather than eliminating it. As detached housing moves beyond the reach of many first home buyers, demand shifts toward higher-density stock. Buyers substitute land for location, size for access and houses for apartments. The price-to-income ratio signals that the median dwelling is expensive relative to the median income, but it does not capture how buyers reposition themselves within the lower half of the market.

Government policy has also become increasingly important in shaping entry conditions. ABS data shows first home buyer owner-occupier loan commitments rose 6.8 per cent in the December quarter 2025 to 31,783 loans, up 9.1 per cent over the year. These increases coincided with the expansion of the Australian Government 5 per cent Deposit Scheme and the introduction of the Help to Buy shared equity program. Such schemes materially reduce the deposit hurdle, which is often the most binding constraint for first home buyers.

While it is estimated that it takes 11 years to save a 20 per cent deposit, entry with a 5 per cent deposit significantly shortens that timeline. Shared equity arrangements reduce the initial loan size required, lowering repayments and easing serviceability thresholds. These programs do not make housing inexpensive, but they change the structure of entry by redistributing risk and bringing forward demand. Price-to-income ratios do not incorporate these policy settings, yet they meaningfully influence who can participate in the market.

Intergenerational wealth transfers are another increasingly important factor shaping affordability outcomes. The so-called “Bank of Mum and Dad” has become a significant source of deposit funding, particularly in higher-priced markets. Parents who have benefited from decades of capital growth can gift deposits, provide guarantees against existing equity, or bring forward inheritance through early transfers. In an environment where housing wealth has grown much faster than incomes, accumulated equity within older cohorts is effectively being recycled into the market to assist younger buyers.

Credit conditions also play a central role. Affordability is not determined solely by the relationship between income and price, but by what banks are willing to lend and what households can service. Thirty-year loan terms are now standard, effectively spreading higher purchase prices over longer periods. Borrowers frequently refinance over time, smoothing cash flow pressures and extending repayment horizons. Serviceability buffers and lending competition can expand or contract borrowing capacity without any change in household income.

High loan-to-valuation lending supported by lenders mortgage insurance or government guarantees allows entry with smaller deposits, even as overall debt levels rise. ABS data shows the average first home buyer loan size rose to $607,624 in the December quarter, reflecting both higher dwelling values and increased reliance on borrowing capacity. These lending dynamics are not visible in a simple ratio of price to income.

None of this diminishes the reality that affordability has deteriorated. Deposit hurdles remain historically high, servicing burdens are elevated relative to long-run averages, and rental affordability has tightened. More Australians are renting for longer, and the divide between property owners and non-owners is widening.

However, the persistence of buyer activity demonstrates that housing markets adapt. Buyers adjust the type of property they purchase, the deposit they provide, the loan structure they use and the extent to which they rely on policy support or family assistance. Price-to-income ratios provide a valuable structural indicator of long-term pressure, but they cannot explain behavioural adaptation, institutional support or compositional change within the market.

The ratio tells us housing is expensive relative to income. The broader data tells us how households are still finding ways to transact. Understanding affordability in the current environment therefore requires looking beyond a single metric and examining how credit, policy, family wealth and dwelling type interact to shape who can access the market and how they do so.

Up next

Price growth moderates in February but annual gains at strongest levels since mid-2022
Back to top